Home
News
Information
Recreation
What We Do
BLM Facts
Directory
BLMtoolbar399-d Site Map Search Site Map Frequently Asked Questions e-mail us
*
Photos
*
Bookstore
*
Upcoming Events
*
Wildlife Database
*
BLM National Home page
*
Español
Search Browse e-mail us Frequently Asked Questions

United States
Department of the Interior
Bureau of Land Managment

May 1997

RANGELAND HEALTH STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR CALIFORNIA AND NORTHWESTERN NEVADA

Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

Browse the EIS Search the EIS Comment on the EIS
Read all of the comments on this EIS

The Rangeland Health Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) analyses potential environmental, social and economic impact of proposed standards for sustaining the health of rangelands and guidelines for the management of livestock grazing activities (S&Gs).

The S&Gs and alternatives were developed through close coordination with the BLM s Resource Advisory Councils and others in a series of workshops, as well as through the incorporation of comments received during an extended scoping period in 1996. The S&Gs address such elements as watershed function; nutrient cycling and energy flow; water quality; habitat for endangered, threatened, proposed Candidate 1 or 2, or special status species; and habitat quality for native plant and animal populations and communities.

The proposed S&Gs cover BLM managed lands in northern and central California and northwestern Nevada. S&Gs for lands administered by the California Desert District are being developed through separate efforts in conjunction with the development of coordinated management plans and are not included in the DEIS.

Comments must be submitted by August 31, 1997, via email or to the BLM at Rangeland Health Coordinator, Bureau of Land Management, 2135 Butano Drive, Sacramento, CA 95825.

All comments, including names and street addresses of respondents, will be available for public review at the above address during regular business hours (7:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.), Monday through Friday, except holidays, and may be published as part of the EIS or other related documents. Comments submitted electronically will be available for review via the internet. If you wish to withhold your name, street address or email address from public review or from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your written comment. Such requests will be honored to the extent allowed by law. All submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, will be made available for public inspection in their entirety.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  • MAPS
  • California BLM Administered Land
  • Resource Advisory Councils
  • Area of Analysis
  • Floristic Provinces
  • Wild Horse and Burro Herd Management Areas
  • Important Range Counties for Economic Analysis
  • CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
  • 1.1 Background
  • 1.2 Purpose and Need
  • 1.3 Fundamentals of Rangeland Health
  • 1.4 Standards and Guidelines -- Basic Concepts
  • 1.5 Process for Establishing Standards and Guidelines
  • 1.6 Public Scoping, Issues
  • 1.7 Assumptions
  • 1.8 Issues Not Addressed in the Analysis
  • 1.9 Analysis Area
  • 1.10 California Desert Conservation Area
  • 1.11 Other Plans and NEPA Analysis
  • 1.12 Legal Framework
  • CHAPTER 2: DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERNATIVES
  • 2.1 Introduction
  • 2.2 Plan Amendments
  • 2.3 Water Quality -- Best Management Practices
  • 2.4 Implementation
  • 2.5 Alternative 1: Standards & Guidelines Proposed by the Resource Advisory Councils
  • 2.51 Bakersfield RAC Recommended Standards and Guidelines
  • Bakersfield Standards for Rangeland Health
  • Bakersfield RAC Guidelines for Grazing Management
  • 2.52 Ukiah RAC Recommended Standards and Guidelines
  • Ukiah Standards for Healthy Ranglands
  • Ukiah Guidelines for Livestock Management
  • 2.53 Susanville RAC Recommended Standards and Guidelines
  • Susanville Standards for Rangeland Health
  • Susanville RAC Guidelines for Livestock Grazing
  • 2.6 Alternative 2: State-wide Consistency/Consolidated Standards and Guidelines
  • State-wide Standards
  • State-wide Guidelines
  • 2.6 Alternative 3: No Action (Fall-back Standards and Guidelines from the Regulations)
  • Fall-back Standards
  • Fall-back Guidelines
  • 2.8 Alternative 4: Rapid Improvement/Rapid Recovery Standards and Guidelines
  • Rapid Improvement Standards
  • Rapid Improvement Guidelines
  • CHAPTER 3: AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
  • 3.1 General Setting
  • 3.1.1 Landforms
  • 3.1.2 Climate
  • 3.1.3 Hydrology
  • 3.2 Grazing Management and Administration
  • 3.2.1 Allotments and Types of Operation
  • 3.2.2 Grazing Permits and Leases
  • 3.2.3 Range Improvements
  • 3.2.4 Grazing Systems
  • 3.2.5 Monitoring
  • 3.3 Uplands
  • 3.3.1 Soils
  • 3.3.2 Vegetation
  • 3.3.3 Upland Conditions and Trends
  • 3.4 Riparian-Wetlands and Stream Channels
  • 3.4.1 Overview
  • 3.4.2 Wetland-Riparian Vegetation
  • 3.4.3 Water Quality
  • 3.5 Wildlife
  • 3.5.1 Wildlife Communities
  • 3.5.2 Big Game
  • 3.5.3 Upland Game
  • 3.5.4 Riparian, Wetland, and Aquatic Communities
  • 3.6 Special Status Species
  • 3.7 Wild Horses and Burros
  • 3.8 Recreation
  • 3.9 Wilderness
  • 3.10 Cultural Resources
  • 3.10.1 Cultural Properties
  • 3.10.2 Traditional Lifeway Values
  • 3.11 Economic Conditions
  • 3.11.1 The Western United States
  • 3.11.1.1 The Western Livestock Industry
  • 3.11.1.2 Western Employment and Income -- Regional Trends
  • 3.11.1.3 Western Ranch Income and Operations
  • 3.11.1.4 Permit Value in the Western United States
  • 3.11.1.5 Government Transfer Payments
  • 3.11.1.6 Western United States Federal Rangeland Management Revenues and Costs
  • 3.11.2 State of California (and N.W. Nevada)
  • 3.11.2.1 California Employment and Income by Major Industry
  • 3.11.2.2 California Livestock Operations and Production
  • 3.11.2.3 Government Transfer Payments -- PILT, Grazing Fees
  • 3.11.2.4 BLM Rangeland Management Program Expenses
  • 3.11.3 Principal BLM Grazing Program Counties
  • 3.11.3.1 County Geographic Size, Total Population and Population Density
  • 3.11.3.2 County Employment and Income
  • 3.11.3.3 Livestock Operations and Production
  • 3.11.3.4 Government Transfer Payments -- PILT, Grazing Fees
  • 3.11.3.5 Permit Value
  • 3.11.3.6 California Possessory Interest Tax
  • 3.11.3.7 Farm Real Estate Values
  • CHAPTER 4: IMPACT ANALYSIS
  • 4.1 Introduction
  • 4.2 Impacts Common to All Alternatives
  • 4.2.1 Grazing Management
  • 4.2.2 Uplands
  • 4.2.2.1 Soils
  • 4.2.2.2 Vegetation
  • 4.2.3 Riparian-wetlands and Stream Channels
  • 4.2.3.1 Overview
  • 4.2.3.2 Vegetation
  • 4.2.3.3 Riparian Hydrology and Water Quality
  • 4.2.4 Wildlife
  • 4.2.4.1 Wildlife Communities
  • 4.2.4.2 Big Game
  • 4.2.4.3 Upland Game
  • 4.2.4.4 Fisheries
  • 4.2.5 Special Status Species
  • 4.2.6 Wild Horses and Burros
  • 4.2.7 Recreation
  • 4.2.8 Wilderness
  • 4.2.9 Cultural Resources
  • 4.3 Differences between Alternatives
  • 4.3.1 Grazing Management
  • 4.3.1.1 Alternative 1, The Proposed Action
  • 4.3.1.2 Alternative 2 -- State-wide Consistency/Consolidated Standards and Guidelines
  • 4.3.1.3 Alternative 3 -- No Action (Fall-Back Standards and Guidelines)
  • 4.3.1.4 Alternative 4 -- Rapid Improvement/Rapid Recovery Alternative
  • 4.3.2 Uplands
  • 4.3.2.1 Soils
  • 4.3.3 Riparian-wetlands and Stream Channels
  • 4.3.3.1 Water Quality
  • 4.3.4 Economics
  • 4.3.4.1 EIS Study Area Analysis
  • 4.3.4.2 Principal Grazing Counties
  • 4.3.4.3 Impacts on Individual Livestock Operations
  • 4.3.4.4 Economic Impact Analysis Closing Comments
  • CHAPTER 5: CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION
  • 5.1 Consultation
  • 5.2 Public Participation
  • 5.2.1 Resource Advisory Councils
  • 5.2.2 Scoping
  • 5.2.3 Distribution of the Draft EIS
  • 5.2.4 Additional Action
  • 5.3 List of Preparers
  • 5.3.1 Bakersfield RAC
  • 5.3.2 Ukiah RAC
  • 5.3.3 Susanville RAC
  • 5.3.4 Public Interest Groups, Agency
  • 5.3.5 BLM Preparers
  • Appendices

  • APPENDIX 1: Rangeland Health Evaluation Matrix
  • APPENDIX 2: Grazing EISs in California
  • APPENDIX 3: Legal Framework
  • APPENDIX 4: Land Use Plans in California
  • APPENDIX 5: Allotment Priority Categorization
  • APPENDIX 6: Implementation Process
  • APPENDIX 7: Condition and Trend
  • APPENDIX 8: Best Management Practices for Water Quality -- California
  • APPENDIX 9: Best Management Practices for Water Quality -- Nevada
  • APPENDIX 10: Draft Water Quality Plan
  • APPENDIX 11: Special Status Plant Species
  • APPENDIX 12: Special Status Animal Species
  • APPENDIX 13: Wilderness Study Areas and Wilderness Areas
  • APPENDIX 14: Soil Standards
  • APPENDIX 15: Adequacy of Water Quality Standards and Guidelines
  • APPENDIX 16: Guidelines for All Alternatives
  • APPENDIX 17: Explanation of Economic Analysis Methodology
  • APPENDIX 18: Impacts Comparison by Alternative
  • REFERENCES
  • Page last updated: 2002-11-26 11:30:06.48

    [Home][News][Information][Recreation][What We Do][BLM Facts][Directory]

    Bureau of Land Management
    California State Office
    2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-1834
    Sacramento, CA 95825-1886
    Phone: (916) 978-4400
    Phone: (916) 978-4416
    TDD (916) 978-4419
    Contact Us via eMail
    This is a U.S. Government computer system. Before continuing please read this Disclaimer, Privacy Policy, and Kid´s Privacy Policy